Continuing with our document review. Side note: New FOIA’s are expected back soon, including production from DARPA related to one of our FOIA lawsuits. Most of the FOIA’s on the lawsuit had no issues, they did tell me that the DOD found no contracts with Packet Forensics which is just silly. There are dozens of news articles referencing the contracts with Packet Forensics, and there’s plenty of other information contradicting them with PF plainly listed on the HACCS contract. We pushed back on that, but that’s the kind of frustrating grind that our FOIA system involves.
I’d love to know more about the DARPA ask that so inflamed Rodney. And what’s behind the rage that Joffe has about “DARPA f’ng him over” (inferred from paraphrase). But likely as mundane as USG foot-dragging where contractor proceeds optimistically with assurances from PM and government project account managers could care less about verbal promises over “what’s in the contract”. The BCC exposes the key players in this staged drama.
I’d love to know more about the DARPA ask that so inflamed Rodney. And what’s behind the rage that Joffe has about “DARPA f’ng him over” (inferred from paraphrase). But likely as mundane as USG foot-dragging where contractor proceeds optimistically with assurances from PM and government project account managers could care less about verbal promises over “what’s in the contract”. The BCC exposes the key players in this staged drama.